The Four Ottoman Vilayets

Before there was Albania, there were four vilayets—and understanding them explains everything that came after.

On this page

Before there was Albania, there were four vilayets—and understanding them explains everything that came after.

When Albanian nationalists gathered in Prizren in 1878, their most persistent demand was unification: bring all Albanian-inhabited lands under one administration. This demand would echo through every subsequent Albanian political movement until independence in 1912, and the failure to achieve it fully would haunt the Balkans for another century.

But what were these four vilayets? How did they come to govern Albanian territories? And what did life actually look like under Ottoman provincial administration?

Ottoman provincial governance

The vilayet was the Ottoman Empire’s primary unit of provincial administration, established through the Vilayet Law of 1864 as part of the Tanzimat reforms. The law replaced the older eyalet system with a standardized, centralized structure modeled on French prefectures. Each vilayet was governed by a vali (governor-general) appointed directly by the Sultan, with subordinate administrative layers: sanjaks (sub-provinces) under a mutasarrif, kazas (districts) under a kaymakam, and nahiyes (communes) at the local level.

The reforms aimed to strengthen central control, standardize taxation, improve infrastructure, and integrate diverse populations into a more coherent imperial structure. By the time of the 1878 crisis, Albanian-inhabited territories fell under four major vilayets: Kosova in the center, Shkodër in the north, Janina in the south, and Monastir in the east.

The Kosova Vilayet

Kosova Vilayet was the youngest and most strategically important of the four. Created in December 1877 during the Russo-Turkish War, it consolidated Ottoman authority in the western Balkans as Serbian and Montenegrin forces advanced. The vilayet was carved from remnants of the Danube Vilayet (which had collapsed under military pressure), the short-lived Vilayet of Prizren (1868-1877), and parts of the former eyalets of Niš and Skopje.

The vilayet’s territory was vast, encompassing not just Kosova proper but the Sanjak of Novi Pazar (which separated Serbia from Montenegro), the regions around Skopje and Tetovo, and the mountainous areas of western Macedonia. Its capital was initially Pristina, but moved to Skopje in 1888 for better administrative control.

Demographically, Kosova Vilayet was approximately two-thirds Muslim (predominantly Albanian, with Bosniak populations concentrated in Novi Pazar) and one-third Christian (primarily Serbs in eastern districts, with smaller Orthodox Albanian and Bulgarian communities). The Albanian Muslim majority gave the vilayet its distinctive character and made it the center of Albanian political activity. Prizren, with its famous mosque complex and educated urban population, became the birthplace of organized Albanian nationalism when the League of Prizren formed there in June 1878.

The vilayet faced constant pressure from Serbian and Montenegrin irredentism. The 1877-78 war had already displaced thousands of Muslim Albanians from the Niš region into Kosova, creating refugee populations that fueled resistance to further territorial transfers. When the Treaty of Berlin attempted to award Albanian-inhabited towns to Montenegro, it was Kosova Vilayet’s populations that mounted the fiercest resistance.

Shkodër Vilayet in the Catholic north

Shkodër Vilayet (also called Scutari Vilayet) governed northern Albania from its establishment in 1867 until Albanian independence. Its capital, Shkodra, was one of Albania’s most important cities—a commercial hub connecting the Adriatic coast to the interior highlands, with a mixed Catholic and Muslim population and a tradition of urban sophistication.

The vilayet’s history was inseparable from what came before it: the semi-autonomous Bushatli Pashalik. From 1757 to 1831, the Bushatli family had ruled northern Albania as virtually independent sovereigns. At its height under Kara Mahmud Bushati, the pashalik controlled not only northern Albania but most of Montenegro, southern Serbia, Kosova, and parts of northwestern Macedonia. Kara Mahmud conducted independent foreign policy, minted coins, and treated with European powers as an equal. The Ottomans finally crushed this independence in 1831, when Grand Vizier Mehmed Reshid Pasha forced the last Bushatli pasha to surrender and executed approximately 500 Albanian notables in Bitola.

The Shkodër Vilayet that replaced this autonomous entity was smaller, more constrained, and more directly controlled by Constantinople. But it retained the north’s distinctive character. The highland tribes—the Malësorë—continued governing themselves under the Kanun of Lekë Dukagjini, the customary law code that regulated blood feuds, marriage, hospitality, and property. Ottoman authority barely penetrated these mountains; highlanders paid annual tribute but remained armed, exempt from conscription, and effectively self-governing.

This region contained the largest concentration of Albanian Catholics, particularly in the highlands of Mirdita, Dukagjin, and the Malësia region bordering Montenegro. The Catholic Church, through its network of parishes and Franciscan monasteries, served as a crucial institution preserving Albanian identity—one of the few contexts where Albanian could be written and taught. Catholic intellectual figures like Pashko Vasa dhe Gjergj Fishta would play central roles in the national awakening.

The vilayet also faced the most direct territorial threat from Montenegro, whose expansion the treaties of 1878 and subsequent years repeatedly advanced at Albanian expense. The battles for Plav, Gusinje, and Ulcinj were fought by populations from Shkodër Vilayet.

Janina Vilayet in the Orthodox south

Janina Vilayet (also called Ioannina Vilayet) governed southern Albania and Epirus from 1867. Its capital, Ioannina (Albanian: Janinë), was one of the Balkans’ great commercial and intellectual centers—a city of merchants, craftsmen, and scholars whose educated class would provide crucial leadership to both Greek and Albanian national movements.

Like Shkodër, Janina Vilayet inherited a legacy of semi-autonomous Albanian rule. Ali Pasha of Tepelena had governed these lands from 1788 until his assassination in 1822, building a domain of 75,000 square kilometers that spanned central and southern Albania, Epirus, Thessaly, and parts of the Peloponnese. Ali Pasha hosted Lord Byron, negotiated with Napoleon and the British, maintained his own army and navy, and ruled with a combination of brutality and administrative competence that made his court a minor European power. His destruction by Sultan Mahmud II ended Albanian autonomy in the south.

The vilayet’s demographics were complex. Approximately 69% of the population was Albanian (both Muslim and Orthodox), with 23% Greek concentrated in urban areas and coastal districts. Significant Aromanian (Vlach) communities added further diversity. The city of Ioannina itself showed a pattern common in the southern Balkans: Greek dominated urban commerce and culture, while Albanian Muslims formed the majority in surrounding rural areas.

This complexity created particular challenges for national consciousness. Orthodox Albanians in the south attended Greek-language schools, worshipped in churches under the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, and absorbed Greek cultural influence. Many educated Orthodox Albanians identified with Hellenism rather than an Albanian nation. The Greek Patriarchate actively opposed Albanian-language liturgy and education, threatening excommunication for those who read or wrote Albanian.

Yet it was from this challenging environment that some of the awakening’s most important figures emerged. The Frashëri brothers—Abdyl, Naim, and Sami—came from a village near Përmet in the vilayet’s interior. Their Bektashi religious orientation (a heterodox Sufi order with syncretic elements) provided distance from both Ottoman Sunni orthodoxy and Greek ecclesiastical influence, enabling them to articulate a distinctly Albanian identity.

Janina Vilayet faced Greek irredentism as its primary external threat. The Congress of Berlin’s provisions for Greek territorial gains, ultimately realized in the 1881 transfer of Thessaly and Arta, demonstrated that Albanian lands in the south were no more secure than those in the north.

Monastir Vilayet in the eastern frontier

Monastir Vilayet (Bitola Vilayet) was the most ethnically heterogeneous of the four, governing the volatile borderlands where Albanian, Slavic, Greek, and Aromanian populations intersected. Established in 1874 and reorganized in 1879, the vilayet took its name from its capital, Bitola (known as Monastir in its Ottoman form)—a city of such international importance that it hosted twelve foreign consulates, earning it the nickname “the city of consuls.”

Albanian populations concentrated in the vilayet’s western sanjaks, particularly around Korçë dhe Dibra. The eastern districts contained Bulgarian-speaking populations aligned with the Bulgarian Exarchate (established 1870), Serbian-aligned communities, Greek populations, and the Aromanian speakers whose own national identity remained contested. This demographic complexity made Monastir Vilayet the primary theater for competing Balkan nationalisms, with Greek, Bulgarian, Serbian, and eventually Albanian bands conducting armed propaganda campaigns to claim populations and territory.

Korçë emerged as a particularly important Albanian center. Its educated merchant class, connections to diaspora communities (particularly in Egypt and Romania), and relative distance from both Ottoman authority and Greek ecclesiastical pressure made it fertile ground for Albanian cultural activity. The first Albanian-language school inside Albania proper opened in Korçë in 1887, taught by Pandeli Sotiri.

Bitola itself played a crucial role in the awakening’s climax. The Congress of Monastir met there in November 1908, adopting the standardized Albanian alphabet that enabled national communication. The choice of location was deliberate: Bitola was accessible, cosmopolitan, and—in the immediate aftermath of the Young Turk Revolution—temporarily tolerant of Albanian organizing activity.

Life under Ottoman administration

What did ordinary Albanians experience under the vilayet system? The answer varied enormously by region, religion, and class.

Muslim Albanians, particularly in lowland areas, enjoyed the advantages of belonging to the empire’s dominant faith. They served in the army, held administrative positions, could testify in court against Christians, and faced lower tax burdens. The large landowners—the beys—wielded considerable local power, administering justice on their estates and serving as intermediaries between the population and Ottoman authority. For Muslim Albanian elites, the Ottoman system offered opportunity and integration rather than oppression.

Christian Albanians faced different conditions. The millet system placed Orthodox Albanians under the jurisdiction of the Greek Patriarchate, which controlled education, family law, and religious life—and used that control to promote Greek identity. Catholic Albanians in the north had their own millet (formally recognized in 1831), with the Austro-Hungarian Empire serving as their nominal protector. Both communities paid the higher taxes imposed on non-Muslims, though the harshest discriminations had been formally abolished by Tanzimat reforms.

Highland tribes in both north and south occupied a special position. Too remote and too well-armed to govern directly, they paid nominal tribute while maintaining effective self-rule. The Kanun regulated their affairs; tribal assemblies decided disputes; blood feuds enforced justice where Ottoman courts could not reach. This autonomy preserved distinctive Albanian identity in regions where neither Ottoman Turkification nor Greek ecclesiastical influence penetrated deeply.

Economic life centered on agriculture, pastoralism, and trade. The great trade routes connecting the Adriatic ports (Durrës, Vlora, Shkodra) to the interior Balkans passed through Albanian lands. Shkodra was renowned for its silks and metalwork; Janina for its silversmithing; Korçë for its merchants. But most Albanians were peasants or herders, working the estates of Muslim beys or grazing flocks in the highlands.

The demand for unification

The fragmentation of Albanian-inhabited lands across four vilayets became a central grievance once national consciousness emerged. The League of Prizren’s evolving demands—from initial Ottoman loyalism to calls for autonomy—crystallized around the proposal for a unified Albanian vilayet: bringing Kosova, Shkodër, Janina, and the Albanian-majority portions of Monastir under a single administration with Albanian as the official language.

Ottoman authorities consistently refused this demand, understanding that unified administration would strengthen Albanian identity and autonomy. The Committee of Union and Progress (Young Turks), despite their initial promises of equality, proved equally hostile to Albanian administrative unification after taking power in 1908.

Only under extreme pressure—after Albanian rebels captured Skopje in August 1912—did the Ottoman government finally agree to create an Albanian Vilayet. The September 4, 1912 agreement accepted most Albanian demands: unified administration, Albanian-language education, Albanian officials, amnesty for rebels. But the First Balkan War erupted before implementation could begin. Within months, Albanian lands were being partitioned among Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece, and Ismail Qemali was raising the flag of independence in Vlorë.

Legacy

The four vilayets ceased to exist with Ottoman collapse, but their legacy endured. The boundaries drawn by the 1913 London Conference—which created an Albanian state encompassing only about 60% of ethnic Albanian territory—reflected the Great Powers’ strategic calculations rather than Albanian aspirations. Kosova went to Serbia; Chameria to Greece; northern districts to Montenegro.

The dream of unification that Albanian nationalists had pursued since 1878—bringing all Albanian lands under one administration—was achieved only partially with independence. The questions the vilayet system had raised about Albanian identity, territory, and governance would continue to shape Balkan politics through two world wars, communist dictatorship, and into the present century.

Understanding the four vilayets—their distinct characters, their demographic complexities, their administrative structures—provides essential context for everything that followed in Albanian history. Before there was a nation, there were these provinces. Their story is Albania’s prehistory.


This article is part of AlbaniaVisit.com’s series on Albanian history. For related reading, see our articles on the League of Prizren dhe Albanian National Awakening.

The Lahuta

The Lahuta

A guide to the lahuta, Albania's one-stringed epic instrument now…
Ilirët

Ilirët

Studiuesit modernë zhvarrosin një shoqëri luftëtarësh të anashkaluar të epokës së hekurit…
Demokracia

Demokracia

Revoltat e studentëve në vitin 1990 ndezën protesta antikomuniste duke marrë vrull përmes…

Enri Zhulati

Enri is a travel writer and journalist. He covers Albanian travel, history, culture, and politics for AlbaniaVisit.com

Kapitulli 6

Erërat e ndryshimit

Dëgjoni këtë kapitull

Tranzicioni i turbullt i Shqipërisë

Thunder rolled across Kennedy Airport's rain-slicked tarmac as I stood at the gate in July 1987, my diplomatic passport heavy in my breast pocket like a stone. Five years of representing Albania at the United Nations had taught me to wear authority like armor, but today that armor felt paper-thin. Beyond the terminal's vast windows, an Alitalia jet waited to carry me home to a country that had begun to view me as foreign, perhaps even dangerous.

The whispers had begun weeks earlier. My replacement at the Albanian Mission, Sazan Bejo, arrived bearing veiled warnings over coffee that tasted suddenly bitter. "Be careful, Ilia," he'd murmured, eyes scanning the Manhattan café for potential listeners. "Things are... complicated at home." Letters from Tirana carried cryptic messages between their lines. My brother, who had always been my protector since childhood, wrote of "unusual interest" in my return. My cousin, a driver for foreign dignitaries, overheard conversations in hotel lobbies that made him say: "They are watching your arrival closely."

Though these warnings lacked concrete evidence, they hung over me like the storm clouds gathering outside the terminal windows. The thought of seeking political asylum had flickered briefly in my mind during sleepless nights, but my daughter remained in Albania, still living under the watchful eye of the communist regime. What retribution might fall on her innocent head if I refused to return? I kept these fears from my wife, whose dark eyes nevertheless reflected her own unspoken anxiety.

"Final boarding call for Alitalia Flight 457 to Rome, continuing on to Tirana," the announcement sliced through my thoughts. I tightened my grip on my carry-on bag and turned to my wife and young son. The moment of decision had arrived.

Two weeks earlier, I had shared a final dinner with Dr. Mike Zotos, a dear friend and Columbia University-educated psychologist whose Greek heritage connected him to the Balkans in ways few Americans could understand. The restaurant's warm lighting had softened the edges of our conversation, but not its substance.

"They're recalling you because you've become too independent," Mike had said, a wine glass held halfway to his lips. "You've seen too much of the outside world."

"Perhaps," I replied, studying the tablecloth's pattern. "Or perhaps they simply need me elsewhere."

Mike's skeptical expression had said everything. Over the years, he and his wife Tulla had become like family to us, their home a sanctuary of warmth and understanding. Years later, after I had returned to America as a graduate student in Wisconsin, the news of Mike's passing would reach me through Tulla's tearful phone call, a reminder that some bonds transcend politics and borders.

Under orders, my wife, young son, and I now boarded the plane. The cabin's stale air carried the scent of cigarettes and cheap cologne. As we took our seats, I felt the weight of two worlds pulling at me – the America that had expanded my horizons, and the Albania that still owned my future. The aircraft shuddered as it lifted into the gray New York sky, and I wondered if I was flying toward my destruction.

Tirana's airport greeted us with the familiar scent of diesel and dust. My eyes scanned the terminal for plainclothes security officers, searching for the telltale bulge of shoulder holsters beneath ill-fitting jackets. To my cautious relief, there were none waiting. Yet the absence of any Foreign Ministry representative to greet a returning diplomat spoke volumes about my uncertain status.

Instead, a lone official Mercedes – an old model showing the wear of diplomatic service – idled at the curb. The driver nodded curtly; he had been sent by Llambi Gegprifti, the mayor of Tirana, a trusted confidant from my earlier days. This unexpected gesture brought a mixture of comfort and unease. At customs, officers examined our luggage with unusual thoroughness, opening even the small suitcase containing my son's toys. Their faces revealed nothing as they waved us through.

The road into Tirana revealed a city unchanged yet somehow diminished since my departure. The same concrete apartment blocks, the same propaganda billboards celebrating the Party's triumphs, the same old men playing chess in the park – but everything seemed grayer, more worn at the edges. Had Albania always been this way, or had my eyes been altered by America's vibrancy?

The following evening found us in Mayor Gegprifti's home, where the rich aroma of traditional tavë kosi – baked lamb with yogurt – filled the dining room. Gegprifti's past roles as Minister of Industry and Mines and Deputy Minister of Defense had endowed him with a keen eye for political currents. Known for his fairness and open-mindedness, he represented a rare breed in Albania's political ecosystem – a man of integrity who had somehow survived the system's hungry appetite for conformity.

Over glasses of raki, the clear spirit catching the light, we exchanged news and memories. I carefully sidestepped any mention of my troubled relationship with our UN ambassador, focusing instead on diplomatic anecdotes that painted Albania in a favorable light. Yet Gegprifti's perceptive eyes caught the shadows behind my carefully chosen words.

"You seem troubled, my friend," he said quietly as his wife stepped out to check on dessert.

"Just tired from the journey," I replied, the lie sitting heavy on my tongue.

He nodded, respecting my reticence, and smoothly steered the conversation toward lighter topics – his daughter's university studies, the promising olive harvest this year. But the undercurrent remained, electric and unspoken. We both knew that in Albania of 1987, silence often carried more truth than words.

Years later, I would remember this evening with particular poignancy when news reached me of Gegprifti's passing in May 2023, at 81. After being accused of "funds abuse" in 1993, only to be acquitted on appeal, he left Albania in 1995. Later entangled in allegations of crimes against humanity that were eventually dropped during the unrest of 1997, he had lived his final years in modest circumstances with his wife Fanika. The contrast between his simple apartment and the opulent villas of Albania's new political elite, who amassed fortunes through dubious means, spoke volumes about the nation's transformation.

The warm reception at Gegprifti's home evaporated like morning mist when I stepped into the Foreign Ministry the next day. The marble halls, once familiar as my own heartbeat, now felt cold and forbidding. Colleagues averted their eyes or offered smiles that never reached them. Whispers followed me like shadows as I made my way to my old office, now occupied by someone else.

"Comrade Zhulati," the receptionist said, the formal address telling me everything I needed to know about my changed status. "You are expected at the Department of Political Intelligence tomorrow morning at nine. The Party Secretary will be present."

I nodded, keeping my face carefully neutral. So it had begun – the reckoning I had feared since receiving my recall orders.

"The Party never forgets, Comrade Zhulati," she added, her voice lowered. "Neither its heroes nor its... disappointments."

That night, I sat at our apartment window, watching the lights of Tirana flicker in the distance. My wife moved quietly behind me, unpacking our belongings, arranging our sparse furniture into the semblance of a home. Neither of us mentioned tomorrow's meeting. Some fears are too large for words, casting shadows that swallow conversation whole.

My path to the diplomatic posting in New York had been fraught with political obstacles from the beginning. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, discovering my wife's family ties to a political prisoner – her uncle, imprisoned for the crime of criticizing the regime's prioritization of bunkers over housing – had initially blocked my appointment. Only President Ramiz Alia's direct intervention, recognizing my linguistic skills and diplomatic potential, had secured the coveted position.

Yet even in New York, thousands of miles from Albania, the regime's paranoia had reached across oceans to monitor my every move. My predecessor at the UN Mission, the party secretary of the Department of Political Intelligence, had spent more time monitoring Albanian émigré radio broadcasts than engaging in actual diplomacy. His English had been rudimentary at best, his diplomatic skills nonexistent. I, by contrast, had focused on building bridges, delivering speeches, exercising Albania's Right of Reply in UN committees, and cultivating relationships with journalists and diplomats from across the political spectrum.

Our approaches could not have been more different, and therein lay my vulnerability. I saw Albanian émigrés not as enemies of the state but as disillusioned patriots who still loved their homeland, if not its government. This view, which I had dared to express in a confidential memo to President Alia, was heresy in a system where ideological purity trumped pragmatic engagement.

That evening, a knock at our door startled us. A colleague from the Ministry stood outside, his face tense with unease. "I was in the neighborhood," he said, the transparent lie hanging between us. Over coffee and raki, we exchanged pleasantries until my wife discreetly withdrew to put our son to bed.

"They sent me to gauge your defense for tomorrow," he finally admitted, voice barely above a whisper. "The department is...concerned about your testimony."

I thanked him for his honesty, for risking his own position to warn me. "Tell them I will speak the truth as I see it," I said simply. "Nothing more, nothing less."

After he left, I sat alone in our small living room, listening to the unfamiliar sounds of Tirana after years in Manhattan. A dog barked in the distance; someone's radio played folk music through an open window; a couple argued in the apartment above. These ordinary sounds of life continuing, oblivious to the political currents that might soon sweep me away, brought an unexpected comfort. Whatever happened tomorrow, Albania would continue its slow, painful evolution toward whatever future awaited it.

The Department of Political Intelligence occupied the fourth floor of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building, its windows narrow as if suspicious of too much light. Inside, the smell of floor polish and stale cigarette smoke mingled with the distinctive scent of fear – a smell I had almost forgotten during my years in America.

I was ushered into a conference room where a long table dominated the space. Deputy Prime Minister Isai sat at one end, his presence a clear indication of the meeting's importance. Though we had met several times before, his greeting was curt, his eyes avoiding mine. The party secretary opened proceedings with ominous formality.

"Comrade Zhulati, this meeting has been convened to address serious concerns about your activities during your posting in New York."

The Party Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, an elderly man whose face seemed permanently set in disapproval, took over. His voice, weathered by decades of tobacco, scraped through the room like a rusted blade.

"We have reports that you have been contaminated by Western influences," he began, emphasizing each syllable as if teaching a child. "Your interactions with Albanian émigrés – known enemies of our socialist state – raise questions about your ideological commitment. Your conversations with American journalists, particularly with the Voice of America's Dr. Biberaj, suggest a dangerous susceptibility to imperialist propaganda."

As he continued cataloging my supposed transgressions, I studied the faces around the table. Some showed genuine ideological fervor; others merely performed the expected outrage; a few – mostly younger officials – kept their expressions carefully neutral, revealing nothing.

When my turn came to speak, I rose slowly, feeling the weight of every eye in the room. The silence stretched taut as a wire.

"Comrades," I began, the familiar address feeling strange on my tongue after years of 'ladies and gentlemen' at the UN. "I have served Albania with unwavering loyalty for my entire career. In New York, I represented our nation with dignity and effectiveness, raising our profile in international forums where previously we had been invisible."

I turned to address the party secretary directly. "You claim I have been influenced by Western decadence, yet offer no evidence beyond my professional contacts with journalists and diplomats – contacts essential to my role. You suggest my conversations with Dr. Biberaj indicate disloyalty, yet have you actually read his analyses? They are often more nuanced and fair to Albania than many European commentaries."

Regarding the émigrés, I argued that the world had changed. "Albania in 1987 is not Albania of 1950. The geopolitical landscape has shifted, and these scattered communities no longer pose the threat they once did. Many simply wish to reconnect with their homeland, to contribute to its development."

I reminded them that I had voiced similar views directly to President Alia, demonstrating my commitment to honest counsel even when politically inconvenient. "What benefit would it serve Albania to continue treating every expatriate as an enemy? What diplomatic advantage does such isolation bring us?"

Turning to the party secretary, a man whose diplomatic achievements were negligible, I drew the contrast with my own record. "During my time in New York, I delivered numerous speeches in the UN General Assembly and its committees. I exercised Albania's Right of Reply against Britain on the Corfu Channel issue, defending our sovereignty in a forum where such defenses are heard by the entire world. I built relationships with key journalists who now cover Albania with greater understanding."

My voice rose slightly as I reached my conclusion. "What interests could possibly have been harmed by these efforts? After decades of isolation, my work has enhanced Albania's standing and visibility. The world is changing around us, comrades. We must adapt our diplomatic approach to this new reality or risk being left behind."

I saw Deputy Prime Minister Isai's expression shift slightly – a momentary flicker of recognition, perhaps even respect. Several younger officials nodded almost imperceptibly. But the hard-liners remained unmoved, their faces set in ideological stone.

The meeting concluded with a formal reprimand – a mild punishment by Albanian standards, but a black mark on my record nonetheless. As a final act of petty retribution, they reassigned me to the Italian desk, deliberately reducing my role. Yet their shortsightedness soon became apparent as the political landscape shifted. Within months, they found themselves forced to rely on my expertise, expanding my responsibilities to include the crucial U.S., German, and British portfolios.

That evening, I sought out Mayor Gegprifti, my most steadfast ally in the system. Over dinner at a small restaurant where the owner knew to give us a private corner, I recounted the day's events. Gegprifti listened carefully, his weathered fingers turning his wine glass in slow circles.

"You spoke the truth to them," he said finally. "That is both your greatest strength and your most dangerous flaw, my friend."

He shared that he had jokingly asked Interior Minister Isai how many medals I deserved instead of a reprimand. "Isai almost smiled," Gegprifti added. "Almost."

Later, I learned that Gegprifti had cornered Foreign Minister Malile at a diplomatic reception, championing my cause with the persistence of a man who understood power's mechanics intimately. This intervention, combined with Deputy Prime Minister Isai's awareness of my reputation among foreign diplomats, allowed me to retain my position despite the formal censure.

Just weeks after my return, in late August 1987, an unexpected visitor arrived in Albania. Professor Charles Moskos, the distinguished Northwestern University military sociologist, appeared with his wife Ilka. Though the Department had assigned another guide to the American academic couple, Moskos insisted that I accompany them – a request that raised eyebrows but could not be refused without creating a diplomatic incident.

The real purpose of Moskos's visit was transparent to those who understood the subtle language of diplomatic gestures. He had come to ensure I hadn't been imprisoned or worse. His presence sent a clear message to the regime: this Albanian diplomat had powerful friends watching out for his welfare.

Acting Prime Minister Isai, demonstrating unexpected political finesse, personally arranged for me to escort the couple and secured them rooms at Tirana's finest hotel. Deputy Prime Minister Isai called me to his office and ordered me to take Professor Moskos for a special dinner at Dajti Hotel, the best hotel in Albania at the time, a place reserved for dignitaries and diplomats. I took with me also my office friend who had met with Prof. Moskos and his wife Ilka first. During the dinner, Prof. Moskos reiterated the importance of restoring diplomatic relations between Albania and the US and urged that I inform president Alia to take a decision over this important matter. I promised Professor Moskos that I was going to write to president Alia about Professor Moskos coming to Albania and about his appeal that Albania restore diplomatic relations with the US, something important for its strategic and economic development of the country.

The next morning I went to meet again with Prof. Moskos for coffee. Prof. Moskos told me that his wife Ilka was pretty sick from an ear infection for the whole night and asked me if I could get her to an ear specialist.

I immediately arranged for her treatment at a hospital in Tirana, remaining by her side to ensure she received proper care. Moskos's gratitude was profound and genuine. As we walked the hospital corridors together, he squeezed my shoulder.

"We were worried about you, Ilia," he said quietly, when no one else could hear. "Word reached us about your... difficulties."

"I'm still standing," I replied with a small smile. "For now."

"Keep standing," he said, his academic demeanor giving way to something more urgent. "People are watching, and they care what happens to you."

This brief exchange, five sentences total, communicated volumes. In those words lay the assurance that I wasn't forgotten, that beyond Albania's isolated borders, people of influence were aware of my situation. It was a lifeline thrown across ideological divides, a human connection that transcended Cold War barriers.

As 1989 dawned, the winds of change blowing through Eastern Europe became impossible to ignore. Gorbachev's reforms were reshaping the Soviet Union; Poland was negotiating with Solidarity; Hungary was dismantling its border fence with Austria. Yet in Albania, hardliners clung desperately to power, seemingly oblivious to the tectonic shifts occurring around them.

The accusations against me – of being "poisoned" by American ideology and harboring dangerous sympathies for émigrés – revealed how profoundly my accusers misunderstood global affairs. Their worldview remained frozen in the Stalinist ice age, unable to adapt to the thawing international environment.

The irony was not lost on me. Before my return to Albania in late 1987, I had witnessed the Czechoslovakian Prime Minister deliver a historic speech at the UN General Assembly advocating for greater freedom. The thunderous applause that followed had included my own enthusiastic contribution, much to the bewilderment of my Eastern Bloc colleagues. Now, in Tirana, my attempts at pragmatic diplomacy were met with suspicion and scorn by men who had never set foot outside our borders.

By early 1990, the first real cracks were appearing in Albania's hermetic isolation. When Interior Minister Simon Stefani succeeded Isai, I sensed an opportunity. During a meeting in his office – the same office where I had been reprimanded years earlier – I made a bold declaration.

"Minister Stefani," I said, "I will participate in the proposed Vienna summit with Professor Moskos only if President Alia explicitly endorses our efforts toward rapprochement with the United States."

Stefani, momentarily taken aback by my audacity, promised to consult with the president directly. For two days, I waited in a state of suspended animation, unsure whether I had overplayed my hand.

When Stefani summoned me back to his office, his expression gave nothing away. He handed me a document bearing President Alia's official seal.

"If Mr. Zhulati firmly believes that Professor Moskos' colleagues genuinely seek to restore ties between Albania and the United States," the presidential directive read, "assure him that Albania is equally ready for formal bilateral negotiations."

With a wry smile that cracked his typically stern demeanor, Stefani remarked, "You've become quite indispensable, Ilia."

That evening, I shared the news with Mayor Gegprifti over dinner at his home. "Any idea why I'm unexpectedly traveling to Austria?" I asked playfully as we awaited our appetizers.

His puzzlement turned to astonishment as I revealed our mission to finalize the time and place for initiating Albanian-American diplomatic reconciliation. "Oh, that is wonderful!" he exclaimed, his face suddenly years younger. "This is very important, Ilia!" We raised our glasses, toasting to a future neither of us had dared imagine possible.

To my surprise, Gegprifti had been completely unaware of this diplomatic initiative. It seemed President Alia had kept secret meetings with Moskos confidential for five years, from 1985 to 1990, even from his Foreign Minister, Reis Malile. This revelation puzzled me, especially considering Malile's criticism of my views on the émigré community during our contentious meeting in New York in 1986.

I could only conclude that President Alia, ever the strategic thinker, was playing a delicate game. The power struggle between conservative and reformist factions within the Politburo remained fierce. Alia's private desire to establish diplomatic relations with the United States was balanced against his fear of alienating Enver Hoxha's widow, Nexhmije, who still wielded considerable influence among the old guard. By keeping these diplomatic overtures secret, he maintained plausible deniability while testing the waters of international engagement.

Vienna in early April 1990 greeted me with a riot of spring blossoms and a sense of possibility that had long been absent in Tirana. My old friend Ilir Cepani, First Secretary at the Albanian embassy, met me at the airport with a warm embrace. As he drove me through the imperial city's streets, past buildings whose elegance made our Stalinist architecture seem all the more grim by comparison, Cepani chatted about local diplomatic gossip, blissfully unaware of my mission's true purpose.

On April 3, 1990, I entered the elegant Hotel Imperial to meet Professor Moskos for lunch. The restaurant's crystal chandeliers and velvet draperies created an atmosphere of refinement that felt almost surreal after years in Albania's austerity. Prof. Moskos rose as I approached, his face alight with anticipation. After exchanging pleasantries about our families, he sensed from my demeanor that I carried significant news.

"Professor Moskos," I said with a smile I couldn't suppress, "this lunch is on you today."

He laughed, his academic reserve momentarily dissolving. "Don't worry, I have a blank check from the U.S. government."

As the waiter poured a celebratory wine – not the sort one found at casual diplomatic lunches – I raised my glass. "We won," I declared, meeting his eager gaze across the starched tablecloth. "I am here on behalf of President Alia to inform you that Albania is ready to restore diplomatic relations with the United States."

Our glasses clinked, the sound crystalline and perfect, echoing the triumph of years of quiet diplomacy. Empowered to choose the time and place for formal talks, Moskos didn't hesitate. "How about the first week of May at the headquarters of the United Nations in New York?" he proposed.

I readily agreed, feeling the weight of history in that simple nod. After decades of hostility and isolation, after countless missed opportunities and false starts, the door was finally opening.

"I'm going straight to Washington tomorrow," Prof. Moskos declared, his voice charged with purpose. "By this time next week, the wheels will be in motion."

As we left the restaurant and walked through Vienna's cobblestoned streets, a lightness entered my step that had been absent for years. The following day, over coffee at a café near the Hofburg Palace, Moskos shared encouraging news from his American government contacts.

"Ambassador James Woolsey sends his regrets for missing our meeting," he said. "But he wanted me to assure you of Washington's unwavering support for Albania and Kosovo. His exact words were: 'No one will touch them.'" This promise would prove prescient in the years to come, a diplomatic lifeline during the region's darkest hours.

The conversation then took a lighter turn as Moskos mused about possibly becoming the first U.S. ambassador to Albania "if my wife would allow it," he added with a chuckle. Though said in jest, the comment revealed the depth of his commitment to bridge-building between our nations.

As we parted, I sensed the bittersweet nature of our farewell. Our paths were diverging – Prof. Moskos to Washington to formalize what we had begun, I would return to Tirana to navigate the treacherous political currents that still threatened to capsize our fragile vessel of diplomacy. Yet the impact of our work would endure beyond our personal journeys.

Upon my return to the Albanian embassy in Vienna, I discovered that my friend Cepani had weathered an interrogation from Professor Lazeri, President Alia's special advisor. Lazeri, whose academic arrogance was legendary, had been incensed to hear me referred to as "Professor Zhulati" during my visit – a title he considered his exclusive domain. Cepani, demonstrating the diplomatic skill that had earned him his posting, had smoothly explained that I had once been his English teacher, a harmless clarification that nevertheless failed to soothe Lazeri's wounded pride.

Back in Tirana on April 8, 1990, I briefed President Alia on the positive reception of Albania's overture. Four days later, he publicly declared Albania's willingness to establish diplomatic relations with both the United States and the Soviet Union – a dramatic shift that left many in the diplomatic community stunned.

The first formal meeting between Albanian and American delegations in early May 1990 at UN Headquarters proceeded with cautious optimism. Decades of mistrust could not be dispelled in a single session, and Ambassador Pitarka, heading our delegation, returned to Tirana seeking further clarification on specific terms.

Behind the scenes, I wondered how President Alia's advisor, Professor Lazeri – that staunch conservative with his deep-seated suspicion of all things Western – would react as these developments unfolded. Perhaps Alia, demonstrating the strategic acumen that had kept him in power through turbulent times, was deliberately keeping his advisor in the dark until the agreement was too far advanced to derail.

Despite initial momentum, the machinery of the Albanian bureaucracy ground painfully slowly. It wasn't until March 15, 1991, nearly a year after our Vienna meeting, that Foreign Minister Muhamet Kapllani officially signed the memorandum restoring diplomatic relations. This moment represented the culmination of six years of careful work by Professor Moskos and myself, a partnership that had begun in whispers and culminated in formal recognition.

As I watched the signing ceremony, broadcast on Albanian television, a complex emotion washed over me – pride in what we had accomplished, certainly, but also a wistful awareness that Albania opening its doors to America was already changing in ways none of us could fully predict. The future stretched before us, unwritten and uncertain, but at least now we would not face it in isolation.

The shadows of the past still loomed large, and the challenges of rebuilding trust after decades of hostility remained daunting. Yet as spring bloomed across Tirana in 1991, hope began to take root alongside the flowers. The future of Albania was being rewritten, and I had played my small part in that transformation.

During these years of diplomatic maneuvering, my academic aspirations had quietly persisted, a parallel life waiting in the wings. In 1987, I had contacted Thomas Bishop, a linguistics professor at New York University, and his Albanian-American wife, Helen, about visiting Albania once diplomatic ties were restored. The prospect filled them with excitement – Helen would be returning to her ancestral homeland, a journey of both geographic and emotional significance.

Our initial encounter in New York had been facilitated by Leonidas, an Albanian-Greek restaurateur who frequented our events at the UN mission. His own story was emblematic of the diaspora's complexity: fluent in Greek and English but not his native Albanian, he had fled with his father before liberation in 1944, leaving behind his mother and sisters. His annual pilgrimages to Albania continued until his mother's passing, each visit a bittersweet renewal of severed ties.

When the Bishops finally visited in 1990, I arranged for them to be officially invited as "friends of Albania." Over dinners in Tirana, we exchanged stories that spanned continents and ideologies. The Bishops' eagerness to explore Helen's heritage filled me with hope that the barriers between Albania and its far-flung children might finally be dissolving.

During one particularly candid conversation, I confided in Professor Bishop my own academic aspirations. With characteristic generosity, he offered to leverage his connections at the Sorbonne on my behalf. Weeks later, as Albania continued its halting progress toward openness, a letter arrived at my doorstep in Tirana – an invitation to join the prestigious Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Historiques et Physiologiques as an assistant professor and doctoral candidate.

This opportunity represented more than personal advancement; it offered a graceful exit from Albania's increasingly volatile political scene. As 1990 drew to a close, I found myself at the convergence of two paths: one continuing my work in Albania's diplomatic service during this historic transition, the other pursuing academic scholarship in Paris. Both promised to contribute to my homeland's development, though in vastly different ways.

The foundations I had helped lay for diplomatic relations with the United States were beginning to bear fruit. Yet increasingly, I sensed that my future contributions might come through academic rather than diplomatic channels. The Sorbonne invitation represented a bridge between worlds – a chance to bring Western knowledge back to an Albania desperately in need of new ideas and approaches.

As spring approached in 1991, a different Albania was emerging from decades of isolation – an Albania taking its first tentative steps toward democracy, even as I prepared for my own journey of transformation. The diplomatic breakthrough with the United States, culminating in our Vienna meeting and the subsequent formal recognition, had fulfilled my promise to Professor Moskos. Now, as Albania navigated the turbulent waters of democratic transition, a new chapter beckoned from the City of Light.

I stood at my ministry window on my last day before departure, watching Tirana's streets below. The same buildings stood as before, the same mountains ringed the horizon, but everything felt charged with potential. Change had come to Albania at last – halting, uncertain, but undeniable. And change was coming for me as well, carrying me toward Paris and whatever future awaited beyond.

[Fundi i kapitullit 6]

 

Bëhu i pari që di

Merrni përditësime ekskluzive të nisjes dhe oferta speciale
Qasja e parë
Njoftohuni në momentin që libri lançohet
Zbritje ekskluzive
Çmime speciale për ditën e nisjes për abonentët
Përmbajtja bonus
Qasje në fragmente ekskluzive dhe njohuri të autorit
Ne e respektojmë privatësinë tuaj. Çregjistrohu në çdo kohë.
Na ndihmoni të përmirësohemi!
Si mund ta bëjmë këtë artikull më të dobishëm për ju?

This content is copyrighted and cannot be copied or saved.