🦩 We stand with the Flamingo Revolution. Albania is not for sale — save Zvërnec and our protected coast. Sign the petition →

Kosova Is Albanian

I grew up watching Kosova across the border. With envy—at their freedom—while we starved under communism. Then with horror, as 862,979 became refugees.

On this page

The history they tried to erase and the people who refused to disappear

This is an Albanian telling you what happened to Albanians. I won’t pretend otherwise. If you want a “balanced” account that treats ethnic cleansing as a matter of reasonable debate, you’ll find plenty of those. This isn’t one of them.

But here’s what I promise.

Everything in this article is documented. Every claim is sourced. The International Criminal Tribunal, Human Rights Watch, the International Court of Justice, Cambridge historians, genetic studies, Ottoman records—they all say the same thing. The facts aren’t controversial. What’s controversial is saying them out loud.

So let me say it: Kosova is Albanian.

It was Albanian before the Serbian army marched in. It was Albanian after a century of colonization, expulsion, and apartheid. It was Albanian when they tried to empty it in 1999. And it’s Albanian now.

Here’s how I know.

The Land Before the Slavs

Before there were Serbs in the Balkans, there were Dardanians.

The ancient geographer Strabo called them “one of the three strongest Illyrian peoples.” They built a kingdom in what is now Kosova around the 4th century BCE. Rome conquered them in 28 BCE, but their descendants stayed. The Slavic migrations of the 6th and 7th centuries CE washed over much of the Balkans, but archaeological evidence shows a local population survived—what scholars call the Komani-Kruja culture, a non-Slavic civilization that bridged the gap between antiquity and the medieval Albanians.

In 2023, a genetic study analyzing over 6,000 ancient genomes found that modern Albanians carry DNA from Roman-era western Balkan populations—populations ancient sources identified as Illyrian. The study found “significant paternal continuity” stretching back to the Bronze Age.

The place names tell the same story. Naissus became Nish through Albanian phonetic shifts. Ulpiana became Lipjan. These aren’t Slavic transformations—they’re Albanian ones, suggesting Albanians were there when the names changed.

None of this proves Albanians have always been the majority in Kosova. History is messier than that. But it demolishes the claim that Albanians are newcomers, medieval invaders who wandered in from somewhere else. The genetic and linguistic evidence says otherwise: Albanians are among the oldest continuous populations in the Balkans.

Who Lived There

For most of the medieval period, Kosova was multi-ethnic. Serbian monasteries and Albanian villages existed alongside each other. The earliest Ottoman census of Kosova—the 1455 Defter of Branković District—shows a heavily Slavic population, though historians debate how to interpret names recorded for tax purposes in a foreign script.

What isn’t debated is what happened over the next several centuries: gradual demographic shift. By 1624, a Catholic bishop reported that Prizren had 200 Catholics, 600 Orthodox Serbs, and 12,000 Muslims “almost all of whom were Albanians.” Travelers in the 17th century noted Albanian-speaking populations across the region.

By the mid-19th century, the tipping point had passed. Historian Ger Duijzings: “The middle of the 19th century marked the first time when Albanian speakers formed a majority in Kosovo.”

This wasn’t mysterious. Albanians migrated from the highlands into the fertile lowlands. Some Serbs converted to Islam and, over generations, adopted Albanian language and identity. And critically, after Serbia conquered the Sanjak of Niš in 1877-78, between 49,000 and 130,000 Albanians were expelled from that region—and resettled in Kosova. The refugees had to go somewhere.

By 1912, every available source—Ottoman censuses, German surveys, British journalists—agreed: Albanians were the clear majority. Noel Malcolm, citing Serbian sources, puts the Orthodox Serb population at less than 25%.

This is the population Serbia conquered. Not a Serbian heartland temporarily occupied by migrants. A region where Albanians outnumbered Serbs three to one.

The Conquest

In October 1912, Serbia, Montenegro, Bulgaria, and Greece attacked the Ottoman Empire. Serbian forces swept through Kosovo to the Adriatic coast. The Serbian government called it the “liberation” of “Old Serbia.”

The Albanian majority was not consulted. Ismail Qemal bey Vlora had declared Albanian independence at Vlorë on November 28, 1912, but Albania was not represented at the London Conference of Ambassadors that decided Kosova’s fate. The Great Powers—Britain, France, Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy—drew the borders based on their own interests. Russia backed Serbia. Austria-Hungary wanted to block Serbian expansion. The compromise consigned 30-40% of all Albanians to live outside Albania.

Kosova went to Serbia despite its Albanian majority because Russia insisted Serbia needed “territorial compensation” after being denied Adriatic access.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace sent investigators. Their findings: “Houses and whole villages reduced to ashes, unarmed and innocent populations massacred en masse, incredible acts of violence, pillage and brutality of every kind.” Historian Katrin Boeckh calls the 1912-13 Serbian campaign “the first ethnic cleansing committed in Europe during the 20th century.”

Twenty to twenty-five thousand Albanians were killed in the first months. The violence had a purpose: change the demographics before the diplomats drew the maps.

A Century of Trying to Make Them Leave

The pattern established in 1912 continued for the next 87 years: Serbia tried to change Kosova’s demographics, and Albanians refused to disappear.

In the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia), Albanians weren’t recognized as a national minority. All Albanian-language schools were banned. Between 1918-1945, over 100,000 Albanians left or were expelled. Over 39,000 Serbs and Montenegrins were settled in 374 new colonies, given Albanian land.

Yet Albanians remained the majority: 65% in 1921, 61% in 1931.

In 1937, historian Vaso Čubrilović presented a memorandum to the Serbian Cultural Club titled “Expulsion of the Albanians.” It proposed ethnic cleansing through harassment, fines, arrests, destruction of villages, and paramilitary pressure. Yugoslavia and Turkey signed a 1938 agreement to deport 200,000 “Muslims” over six years. The Turkish Parliament refused to ratify it.

Under Tito, Kosova became a police state where Serbs held 86.6% of security positions despite being only 27.4% of the population. Between 1952-1965, approximately 452,000 Albanians were displaced to Turkey.

Still, they stayed. By 1974, Albanians had gained enough ground that Kosova received near-republic status in the Yugoslav constitution: its own assembly, supreme court, and a seat in the federal presidency. For a brief window, Albanians could fly their flag, attend university in their language, and govern their own affairs.

This is the autonomy Milošević destroyed.

The Milošević Decade

On April 24, 1987, Slobodan Milošević told a crowd of Serbian protestors in Kosova: “Nobody is allowed to beat you.” It was the moment Serbian nationalism captured Yugoslav politics.

In 1989, tanks surrounded the Kosova Assembly building. Under armed guard, the assembly voted to strip Kosova of its autonomy. Assembly member Melihate Termkolli, one of only 10 who voted against, described “tanks and steel-helmeted police armed with automatic rifles.” Twenty Kosova Albanians were killed in the protests that followed.

What followed is documented by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia:

Hundreds of thousands of ethnic Albanians were fired from government jobs. Unemployment among Kosova Albanians exceeded 70% by 1998. All Albanian teachers were fired. Albanian students were banned from schools. The University of Pristina became Serbian-only.

The Albanian response was extraordinary: they built a parallel state. Over 400,000 students attended classes in basements and private homes. The Democratic League of Kosova collected taxes and operated shadow institutions. For nearly a decade, Kosova Albanians practiced nonviolent resistance under Ibrahim Rugova.

It achieved nothing. The 1995 Dayton Accords that ended the Bosnian War completely ignored Kosova. The international community rewarded Milošević for making peace in Bosnia while he maintained apartheid in Kosova.

By 1998, support had shifted to the Kosova Liberation Army. The peaceful approach had failed.

1999

I was a teenager when it happened. We watched the refugees pour across the border—862,979 of them, according to UNHCR. More than 90% of Kosova’s Albanian population driven from their homes in eleven weeks.

This was not collateral damage. This was the plan.

The ICTY found “a widespread campaign of violence that was directed against the Kosova Albanian population between March and June 1999” conducted “in an organised manner, utilising significant state resources.”

The methods were systematic: army encirclement, followed by police and paramilitaries entering villages. Door-to-door expulsions at gunpoint. Collection at points like Pristina railway station for organized deportation by overcrowded trains. Robbery of money, jewelry, and vehicles. Rape as a weapon of terror. And crucially, “identity cleansing”—the confiscation and destruction of ID cards, passports, and birth certificates. Piles of burned documents were found at border crossings. The intent was to strip Kosova Albanians of citizenship and prevent any return.

The massacres:

Meja, April 27: 377 civilians killed—the largest single massacre. Men and boys aged 15-60 separated and executed. 287 bodies later found in mass graves at Batajnica, Serbia.

Qyshk, May 14: 41 men killed, ages 19-69, gunned down with automatic weapons in houses then set on fire.

Suva Reka, March 25-26: 47 members of the Berisha family killed, including 11 children.

The Humanitarian Law Center’s Kosova Memory Book—the most rigorous documentation effort—identified 13,548 people killed or missing, of whom 10,812 were Albanians.

The Serbian government tried to hide the evidence. At Batajnica, a Belgrade suburb, 744 bodies were discovered in 2001 at a police training center—transported by truck from Kosova, many burned before burial. Interior Ministry official Obrad Stevanovic’s diary contained the notation: “No body, no crime.”

The ICTY convicted multiple senior officials. The tribunal found the existence of a “joint criminal enterprise” whose purpose was “to force a significant number of Kosova Albanians to leave their homes, across the border, [for] the state government to retain control over Kosovo.”

The View from Tirana

Here’s something people outside of the balkans (mainly Americans) don’t understand: Albania and Kosova are not the same place.

When I tell people in the United States that I’m Albanian, sometimes they say, “Oh, that place that was at war, right?” They’re thinking of Kosova. They don’t realize these are two separate countries with intertwined but distinct histories—histories that were forcibly separated for most of the 20th century.

I grew up in Albania during the final years of Enver Hoxha’s communist dictatorship. We were sealed off from the world—from everyone, including our own people across the border. Albania under Hoxha was a prison state. We had no freedom of movement, no contact with the outside, no access to Western media. We were told we were building true socialism. We were starving.

Meanwhile, Kosovars in Yugoslavia had it better. This is strange to say now, given what happened to them, but it’s true. They had relative freedom. They could travel. They had money. During communism, we looked across at our kin and felt something close to envy. They were us—same language, same blood, same songs—but they lived in a different world.

I remember in 1987, when I was seven or eight, there was an altercation between Yugoslavia and Albania. My older sister told me our father might get drafted to fight the Yugoslavs. She said there was a good chance he wouldn’t come back. I don’t know where she heard this—children absorb fear from the air—but I remember the terror of it. Even then, even as a child in Albania, Kosova felt like unfinished business. Something that could explode.

Then communism fell. Albania opened up. We thought the worst was behind us.

And then Kosova exploded.

There’s a cruel irony in the timing. Albania finally escaped its nightmare just as Kosova descended into one. We never got to celebrate together. We never got that moment of reunion. Instead, we watched the refugees pour across our border—800,000 of them, into a country of 3 million that had just emerged from total isolation and economic collapse. We took them in because they were us. What else could we do?

And here’s what almost no one acknowledges: Albanians never made this about ethnic unification.

There is no serious “Greater Albania” movement. Kosova declared independence as Kosova, not as a province seeking to merge with Albania. The referendum, when it came, was about self-determination—about not being ruled by the people who had tried to exterminate them—not about nationalism or territorial expansion.

This restraint is never mentioned. Western coverage of the Balkans treats all nationalisms as equally dangerous, as if Albanians wanting to not be ethnically cleansed is equivalent to the ideology that drove the cleansing. It isn’t. Albanians could have framed Kosova as the first step toward unification. They didn’t. Kosova is its own country. Albania is its own country. We are the same people, separated by borders drawn in 1913 by Great Powers who didn’t care what we wanted, and we’ve chosen to remain separate—neighbors, family, but sovereign.

Maybe to a fault. Maybe we’ve been too quiet about claiming what’s ours, too willing to let others define the narrative. A lot of our people went through an ethnic cleansing, and the world still treats it as a “disputed” issue, a matter for “both sides.

So let me be clear: Kosova is Albanian. Not because I want to annex it—I don’t, and neither does Albania—but because Albanians live there, have lived there for centuries, were the majority when Serbia conquered them, survived a century of attempts to make them leave, and refused to disappear when Serbia tried to empty the land in 1999. They earned their independence. They declared it. The International Court of Justice said it was legal.

It’s not complicated. It just requires saying it.

What About Serbian Claims?

I said I’d be honest. So let me be honest about this too.

Kosova was central to the medieval Serbian state. The monasteries are real and they are magnificent. Visoki Dečani, built in the 1330s, contains over 1,000 preserved original frescoes—the largest gallery of Serbian medieval art. Gračanica Monastery is an architectural masterpiece. The Patriarchate of Peć has been the seat of Serbian Orthodox leadership since 1920. These are UNESCO World Heritage sites deserving protection.

The Battle of Kosova in 1389 holds profound significance in Serbian national consciousness. I understand why. Every nation builds its identity around stories of sacrifice and resilience.

But cultural heritage in a territory does not confer the right to rule over a population that doesn’t consent. The presence of Serbian Orthodox monasteries—even monuments of exceptional universal value—does not establish a right to govern people who don’t want to be governed by you.

Historians note that the Battle of Kosova’s significance was largely constructed later. The kingdom survived in various forms for nearly 70 years afterward. Initial reports didn’t clearly identify it as a defeat. The modern myth evolved through epic poetry codified in the 19th century.

And Kosova was under Ottoman rule for approximately 500 years. By the time of Serbia’s 1912 conquest, Albanians constituted the demographic majority. As Tim Judah summarizes: “For Kosovo’s Serbs the return of the Serbian army was a liberation; for the Albanians, now a majority, it was nothing less than conquest.

Independence

Kosova declared independence on February 17, 2008.

Serbia requested an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice. In July 2010, the Court ruled by a 10-4 vote that “the declaration of independence of Kosova adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”

As of 2026, at least 110 UN member states recognize Kosova, including 22 of 27 EU members, 28 of 32 NATO members, and all G7 countries. Russia and China block UN membership.

Kosova is not a “frozen conflict.” It is a functioning state with internationally recognized borders, a constitution that provides extensive protections for the Serbian minority, and a population that has made clear, through every available democratic means, that it will not return to Serbian rule.

Why This Matters

I have Serbian friends. This isn’t about hating Serbs. Some of the bravest people during the 1999 war were Serbs who opposed what their government was doing.

But I’ve sat at tables where Kosova comes up as a “both sides” issue. Where someone mentions that Albanians did bad things too, as if that balances 862,979 refugees and 10,812 dead. Where the conversation treats ethnic cleansing as a matter of reasonable disagreement.

It isn’t.

The question was never really about medieval battles or Illyrian ancestry. It was about who would rule whom—and whether rule requires consent.

Kosova is Albanian because Albanians have lived there for centuries. Because they were the majority when Serbia conquered them in 1912. Because they survived a century of colonization, expulsion, and apartheid. Because when Serbia tried to empty Kosova in 1999, they came back. Because they built a state out of the wreckage and declared their independence. Because 110 countries recognized that independence as lawful.

And because you cannot rule people who refuse to be ruled.

A Word to Our Serbian Readers & Friends

Our analytics show Serbs visit this site. More travel to Albania every year.

You are welcome here.

This article isn’t about hating Serbs. It’s about telling the truth about what happened to Albanians—a truth documented by international courts, human rights organizations, and historians from every country, including Serbia.

Albanians in Albania have no quarrel with the Serbian people. We share a region. We share complicated history. If you visit Tirana, Berat, or the Riviera, you’ll be treated like any other guest—we have a long tradition of hospitality and generosity toward visitors.

In Albanian culture, any guest — even a stranger or former enemy — is treated with profound honor, as if welcomed by God Himself.

The crimes of 1999 were committed by a government, not a people. Many Serbs opposed what Milošević did. Some risked everything to say so.

Kosova’s independence doesn’t erase Serbian medieval heritage. The monasteries still stand. They deserve protection and visitors. What it erases is the premise that cultural heritage grants the right to rule people who don’t consent.

If you’ve read this far, you’re willing to engage with a difficult history. That matters. Come visit Albania sometime. The coffee is strong, the mountains are endless, and we don’t hold the sins of governments against the people who had no say in them.

Shtëpia e shqiptarit është e mikut dhe e Zotit.
“The house of the Albanian belongs to the guest and to God.”

A centuries-old Albanian proverb rooted in the 15th-century Kanun code and one that still echoes throughout every corner of Albania today. For travelers, this proverb offers reassurance that they will be greeted warmly and generously in Albania, reflecting a deeply ingrained cultural tradition of honoring and caring for every guest.

A Note on Sources

Everything in this article can be verified through mainstream academic and legal sources:

Demographics and History: Noel Malcolm, Kosovo: A Short History (1998); Miranda Vickers, Between Serb and Albanian: A History of Kosovo (1998); Tim Judah’s reporting and scholarship

Genetics: Davranoglou et al., “Ancient DNA reveals the origins of the Albanians” (2023), bioRxiv/published studies analyzing 6,000+ ancient genomes

1999 Ethnic Cleansing: Human Rights Watch documentation; ICTY trial records and judgments; Humanitarian Law Center’s Kosovo Memory Book; UNHCR refugee statistics

International Law: International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence (2010); ICTY convictions of Šainović, Pavković, Lukić

1912-13 Documentation: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan Wars (1914)

This is not a matter of he-said, she-said. The historical record is clear. The legal findings are public. The graves have been found.

The only question is whether you’re willing to look.

87262c92d42acd1c3.73206444

Comments engaging the facts are welcome—including from those who disagree.

What we don’t publish: “both sides” equivalence between ethnic cleansing and resistance to it, revisionist denial of documented atrocities, and ethnic grievance dressed as historical debate. These aren’t counterarguments—they’re noise. Claims that contradict tribunal findings and forensic evidence will be rebutted publicly where useful, and discarded.

AlbaniaVisit.com does not tolerate racist or ethnically essentialist commentary. Serbian readers are welcome here. Serbian nationalism that denies documented war crimes is not.

You do not have a voice here.

Albania Today

Albania Today

Approaching two decades since formally applying to join the EU,…
The Illyrians

The Illyrians

Modern scholars exhume an overlooked Iron Age society of warriors…

Enri Zhulati

Enri is a travel writer and journalist. He covers Albanian travel, history, culture, and politics for AlbaniaVisit.com

Chapter 6

The Winds of Change

Listen to this chapter

Albanias Turbulent Transition

Thunder rolled across Kennedy Airport's rain-slicked tarmac as I stood at the gate in July 1987, my diplomatic passport heavy in my breast pocket like a stone. Five years of representing Albania at the United Nations had taught me to wear authority like armor, but today that armor felt paper-thin. Beyond the terminal's vast windows, an Alitalia jet waited to carry me home to a country that had begun to view me as foreign, perhaps even dangerous.

The whispers had begun weeks earlier. My replacement at the Albanian Mission, Sazan Bejo, arrived bearing veiled warnings over coffee that tasted suddenly bitter. "Be careful, Ilia," he'd murmured, eyes scanning the Manhattan café for potential listeners. "Things are... complicated at home." Letters from Tirana carried cryptic messages between their lines. My brother, who had always been my protector since childhood, wrote of "unusual interest" in my return. My cousin, a driver for foreign dignitaries, overheard conversations in hotel lobbies that made him say: "They are watching your arrival closely."

Though these warnings lacked concrete evidence, they hung over me like the storm clouds gathering outside the terminal windows. The thought of seeking political asylum had flickered briefly in my mind during sleepless nights, but my daughter remained in Albania, still living under the watchful eye of the communist regime. What retribution might fall on her innocent head if I refused to return? I kept these fears from my wife, whose dark eyes nevertheless reflected her own unspoken anxiety.

"Final boarding call for Alitalia Flight 457 to Rome, continuing on to Tirana," the announcement sliced through my thoughts. I tightened my grip on my carry-on bag and turned to my wife and young son. The moment of decision had arrived.

Two weeks earlier, I had shared a final dinner with Dr. Mike Zotos, a dear friend and Columbia University-educated psychologist whose Greek heritage connected him to the Balkans in ways few Americans could understand. The restaurant's warm lighting had softened the edges of our conversation, but not its substance.

"They're recalling you because you've become too independent," Mike had said, a wine glass held halfway to his lips. "You've seen too much of the outside world."

"Perhaps," I replied, studying the tablecloth's pattern. "Or perhaps they simply need me elsewhere."

Mike's skeptical expression had said everything. Over the years, he and his wife Tulla had become like family to us, their home a sanctuary of warmth and understanding. Years later, after I had returned to America as a graduate student in Wisconsin, the news of Mike's passing would reach me through Tulla's tearful phone call, a reminder that some bonds transcend politics and borders.

Under orders, my wife, young son, and I now boarded the plane. The cabin's stale air carried the scent of cigarettes and cheap cologne. As we took our seats, I felt the weight of two worlds pulling at me – the America that had expanded my horizons, and the Albania that still owned my future. The aircraft shuddered as it lifted into the gray New York sky, and I wondered if I was flying toward my destruction.

Tirana's airport greeted us with the familiar scent of diesel and dust. My eyes scanned the terminal for plainclothes security officers, searching for the telltale bulge of shoulder holsters beneath ill-fitting jackets. To my cautious relief, there were none waiting. Yet the absence of any Foreign Ministry representative to greet a returning diplomat spoke volumes about my uncertain status.

Instead, a lone official Mercedes – an old model showing the wear of diplomatic service – idled at the curb. The driver nodded curtly; he had been sent by Llambi Gegprifti, the mayor of Tirana, a trusted confidant from my earlier days. This unexpected gesture brought a mixture of comfort and unease. At customs, officers examined our luggage with unusual thoroughness, opening even the small suitcase containing my son's toys. Their faces revealed nothing as they waved us through.

The road into Tirana revealed a city unchanged yet somehow diminished since my departure. The same concrete apartment blocks, the same propaganda billboards celebrating the Party's triumphs, the same old men playing chess in the park – but everything seemed grayer, more worn at the edges. Had Albania always been this way, or had my eyes been altered by America's vibrancy?

The following evening found us in Mayor Gegprifti's home, where the rich aroma of traditional tavë kosi – baked lamb with yogurt – filled the dining room. Gegprifti's past roles as Minister of Industry and Mines and Deputy Minister of Defense had endowed him with a keen eye for political currents. Known for his fairness and open-mindedness, he represented a rare breed in Albania's political ecosystem – a man of integrity who had somehow survived the system's hungry appetite for conformity.

Over glasses of raki, the clear spirit catching the light, we exchanged news and memories. I carefully sidestepped any mention of my troubled relationship with our UN ambassador, focusing instead on diplomatic anecdotes that painted Albania in a favorable light. Yet Gegprifti's perceptive eyes caught the shadows behind my carefully chosen words.

"You seem troubled, my friend," he said quietly as his wife stepped out to check on dessert.

"Just tired from the journey," I replied, the lie sitting heavy on my tongue.

He nodded, respecting my reticence, and smoothly steered the conversation toward lighter topics – his daughter's university studies, the promising olive harvest this year. But the undercurrent remained, electric and unspoken. We both knew that in Albania of 1987, silence often carried more truth than words.

Years later, I would remember this evening with particular poignancy when news reached me of Gegprifti's passing in May 2023, at 81. After being accused of "funds abuse" in 1993, only to be acquitted on appeal, he left Albania in 1995. Later entangled in allegations of crimes against humanity that were eventually dropped during the unrest of 1997, he had lived his final years in modest circumstances with his wife Fanika. The contrast between his simple apartment and the opulent villas of Albania's new political elite, who amassed fortunes through dubious means, spoke volumes about the nation's transformation.

The warm reception at Gegprifti's home evaporated like morning mist when I stepped into the Foreign Ministry the next day. The marble halls, once familiar as my own heartbeat, now felt cold and forbidding. Colleagues averted their eyes or offered smiles that never reached them. Whispers followed me like shadows as I made my way to my old office, now occupied by someone else.

"Comrade Zhulati," the receptionist said, the formal address telling me everything I needed to know about my changed status. "You are expected at the Department of Political Intelligence tomorrow morning at nine. The Party Secretary will be present."

I nodded, keeping my face carefully neutral. So it had begun – the reckoning I had feared since receiving my recall orders.

"The Party never forgets, Comrade Zhulati," she added, her voice lowered. "Neither its heroes nor its... disappointments."

That night, I sat at our apartment window, watching the lights of Tirana flicker in the distance. My wife moved quietly behind me, unpacking our belongings, arranging our sparse furniture into the semblance of a home. Neither of us mentioned tomorrow's meeting. Some fears are too large for words, casting shadows that swallow conversation whole.

My path to the diplomatic posting in New York had been fraught with political obstacles from the beginning. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, discovering my wife's family ties to a political prisoner – her uncle, imprisoned for the crime of criticizing the regime's prioritization of bunkers over housing – had initially blocked my appointment. Only President Ramiz Alia's direct intervention, recognizing my linguistic skills and diplomatic potential, had secured the coveted position.

Yet even in New York, thousands of miles from Albania, the regime's paranoia had reached across oceans to monitor my every move. My predecessor at the UN Mission, the party secretary of the Department of Political Intelligence, had spent more time monitoring Albanian émigré radio broadcasts than engaging in actual diplomacy. His English had been rudimentary at best, his diplomatic skills nonexistent. I, by contrast, had focused on building bridges, delivering speeches, exercising Albania's Right of Reply in UN committees, and cultivating relationships with journalists and diplomats from across the political spectrum.

Our approaches could not have been more different, and therein lay my vulnerability. I saw Albanian émigrés not as enemies of the state but as disillusioned patriots who still loved their homeland, if not its government. This view, which I had dared to express in a confidential memo to President Alia, was heresy in a system where ideological purity trumped pragmatic engagement.

That evening, a knock at our door startled us. A colleague from the Ministry stood outside, his face tense with unease. "I was in the neighborhood," he said, the transparent lie hanging between us. Over coffee and raki, we exchanged pleasantries until my wife discreetly withdrew to put our son to bed.

"They sent me to gauge your defense for tomorrow," he finally admitted, voice barely above a whisper. "The department is...concerned about your testimony."

I thanked him for his honesty, for risking his own position to warn me. "Tell them I will speak the truth as I see it," I said simply. "Nothing more, nothing less."

After he left, I sat alone in our small living room, listening to the unfamiliar sounds of Tirana after years in Manhattan. A dog barked in the distance; someone's radio played folk music through an open window; a couple argued in the apartment above. These ordinary sounds of life continuing, oblivious to the political currents that might soon sweep me away, brought an unexpected comfort. Whatever happened tomorrow, Albania would continue its slow, painful evolution toward whatever future awaited it.

The Department of Political Intelligence occupied the fourth floor of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building, its windows narrow as if suspicious of too much light. Inside, the smell of floor polish and stale cigarette smoke mingled with the distinctive scent of fear – a smell I had almost forgotten during my years in America.

I was ushered into a conference room where a long table dominated the space. Deputy Prime Minister Isai sat at one end, his presence a clear indication of the meeting's importance. Though we had met several times before, his greeting was curt, his eyes avoiding mine. The party secretary opened proceedings with ominous formality.

"Comrade Zhulati, this meeting has been convened to address serious concerns about your activities during your posting in New York."

The Party Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, an elderly man whose face seemed permanently set in disapproval, took over. His voice, weathered by decades of tobacco, scraped through the room like a rusted blade.

"We have reports that you have been contaminated by Western influences," he began, emphasizing each syllable as if teaching a child. "Your interactions with Albanian émigrés – known enemies of our socialist state – raise questions about your ideological commitment. Your conversations with American journalists, particularly with the Voice of America's Dr. Biberaj, suggest a dangerous susceptibility to imperialist propaganda."

As he continued cataloging my supposed transgressions, I studied the faces around the table. Some showed genuine ideological fervor; others merely performed the expected outrage; a few – mostly younger officials – kept their expressions carefully neutral, revealing nothing.

When my turn came to speak, I rose slowly, feeling the weight of every eye in the room. The silence stretched taut as a wire.

"Comrades," I began, the familiar address feeling strange on my tongue after years of 'ladies and gentlemen' at the UN. "I have served Albania with unwavering loyalty for my entire career. In New York, I represented our nation with dignity and effectiveness, raising our profile in international forums where previously we had been invisible."

I turned to address the party secretary directly. "You claim I have been influenced by Western decadence, yet offer no evidence beyond my professional contacts with journalists and diplomats – contacts essential to my role. You suggest my conversations with Dr. Biberaj indicate disloyalty, yet have you actually read his analyses? They are often more nuanced and fair to Albania than many European commentaries."

Regarding the émigrés, I argued that the world had changed. "Albania in 1987 is not Albania of 1950. The geopolitical landscape has shifted, and these scattered communities no longer pose the threat they once did. Many simply wish to reconnect with their homeland, to contribute to its development."

I reminded them that I had voiced similar views directly to President Alia, demonstrating my commitment to honest counsel even when politically inconvenient. "What benefit would it serve Albania to continue treating every expatriate as an enemy? What diplomatic advantage does such isolation bring us?"

Turning to the party secretary, a man whose diplomatic achievements were negligible, I drew the contrast with my own record. "During my time in New York, I delivered numerous speeches in the UN General Assembly and its committees. I exercised Albania's Right of Reply against Britain on the Corfu Channel issue, defending our sovereignty in a forum where such defenses are heard by the entire world. I built relationships with key journalists who now cover Albania with greater understanding."

My voice rose slightly as I reached my conclusion. "What interests could possibly have been harmed by these efforts? After decades of isolation, my work has enhanced Albania's standing and visibility. The world is changing around us, comrades. We must adapt our diplomatic approach to this new reality or risk being left behind."

I saw Deputy Prime Minister Isai's expression shift slightly – a momentary flicker of recognition, perhaps even respect. Several younger officials nodded almost imperceptibly. But the hard-liners remained unmoved, their faces set in ideological stone.

The meeting concluded with a formal reprimand – a mild punishment by Albanian standards, but a black mark on my record nonetheless. As a final act of petty retribution, they reassigned me to the Italian desk, deliberately reducing my role. Yet their shortsightedness soon became apparent as the political landscape shifted. Within months, they found themselves forced to rely on my expertise, expanding my responsibilities to include the crucial U.S., German, and British portfolios.

That evening, I sought out Mayor Gegprifti, my most steadfast ally in the system. Over dinner at a small restaurant where the owner knew to give us a private corner, I recounted the day's events. Gegprifti listened carefully, his weathered fingers turning his wine glass in slow circles.

"You spoke the truth to them," he said finally. "That is both your greatest strength and your most dangerous flaw, my friend."

He shared that he had jokingly asked Interior Minister Isai how many medals I deserved instead of a reprimand. "Isai almost smiled," Gegprifti added. "Almost."

Later, I learned that Gegprifti had cornered Foreign Minister Malile at a diplomatic reception, championing my cause with the persistence of a man who understood power's mechanics intimately. This intervention, combined with Deputy Prime Minister Isai's awareness of my reputation among foreign diplomats, allowed me to retain my position despite the formal censure.

Just weeks after my return, in late August 1987, an unexpected visitor arrived in Albania. Professor Charles Moskos, the distinguished Northwestern University military sociologist, appeared with his wife Ilka. Though the Department had assigned another guide to the American academic couple, Moskos insisted that I accompany them – a request that raised eyebrows but could not be refused without creating a diplomatic incident.

The real purpose of Moskos's visit was transparent to those who understood the subtle language of diplomatic gestures. He had come to ensure I hadn't been imprisoned or worse. His presence sent a clear message to the regime: this Albanian diplomat had powerful friends watching out for his welfare.

Acting Prime Minister Isai, demonstrating unexpected political finesse, personally arranged for me to escort the couple and secured them rooms at Tirana's finest hotel. Deputy Prime Minister Isai called me to his office and ordered me to take Professor Moskos for a special dinner at Dajti Hotel, the best hotel in Albania at the time, a place reserved for dignitaries and diplomats. I took with me also my office friend who had met with Prof. Moskos and his wife Ilka first. During the dinner, Prof. Moskos reiterated the importance of restoring diplomatic relations between Albania and the US and urged that I inform president Alia to take a decision over this important matter. I promised Professor Moskos that I was going to write to president Alia about Professor Moskos coming to Albania and about his appeal that Albania restore diplomatic relations with the US, something important for its strategic and economic development of the country.

The next morning I went to meet again with Prof. Moskos for coffee. Prof. Moskos told me that his wife Ilka was pretty sick from an ear infection for the whole night and asked me if I could get her to an ear specialist.

I immediately arranged for her treatment at a hospital in Tirana, remaining by her side to ensure she received proper care. Moskos's gratitude was profound and genuine. As we walked the hospital corridors together, he squeezed my shoulder.

"We were worried about you, Ilia," he said quietly, when no one else could hear. "Word reached us about your... difficulties."

"I'm still standing," I replied with a small smile. "For now."

"Keep standing," he said, his academic demeanor giving way to something more urgent. "People are watching, and they care what happens to you."

This brief exchange, five sentences total, communicated volumes. In those words lay the assurance that I wasn't forgotten, that beyond Albania's isolated borders, people of influence were aware of my situation. It was a lifeline thrown across ideological divides, a human connection that transcended Cold War barriers.

As 1989 dawned, the winds of change blowing through Eastern Europe became impossible to ignore. Gorbachev's reforms were reshaping the Soviet Union; Poland was negotiating with Solidarity; Hungary was dismantling its border fence with Austria. Yet in Albania, hardliners clung desperately to power, seemingly oblivious to the tectonic shifts occurring around them.

The accusations against me – of being "poisoned" by American ideology and harboring dangerous sympathies for émigrés – revealed how profoundly my accusers misunderstood global affairs. Their worldview remained frozen in the Stalinist ice age, unable to adapt to the thawing international environment.

The irony was not lost on me. Before my return to Albania in late 1987, I had witnessed the Czechoslovakian Prime Minister deliver a historic speech at the UN General Assembly advocating for greater freedom. The thunderous applause that followed had included my own enthusiastic contribution, much to the bewilderment of my Eastern Bloc colleagues. Now, in Tirana, my attempts at pragmatic diplomacy were met with suspicion and scorn by men who had never set foot outside our borders.

By early 1990, the first real cracks were appearing in Albania's hermetic isolation. When Interior Minister Simon Stefani succeeded Isai, I sensed an opportunity. During a meeting in his office – the same office where I had been reprimanded years earlier – I made a bold declaration.

"Minister Stefani," I said, "I will participate in the proposed Vienna summit with Professor Moskos only if President Alia explicitly endorses our efforts toward rapprochement with the United States."

Stefani, momentarily taken aback by my audacity, promised to consult with the president directly. For two days, I waited in a state of suspended animation, unsure whether I had overplayed my hand.

When Stefani summoned me back to his office, his expression gave nothing away. He handed me a document bearing President Alia's official seal.

"If Mr. Zhulati firmly believes that Professor Moskos' colleagues genuinely seek to restore ties between Albania and the United States," the presidential directive read, "assure him that Albania is equally ready for formal bilateral negotiations."

With a wry smile that cracked his typically stern demeanor, Stefani remarked, "You've become quite indispensable, Ilia."

That evening, I shared the news with Mayor Gegprifti over dinner at his home. "Any idea why I'm unexpectedly traveling to Austria?" I asked playfully as we awaited our appetizers.

His puzzlement turned to astonishment as I revealed our mission to finalize the time and place for initiating Albanian-American diplomatic reconciliation. "Oh, that is wonderful!" he exclaimed, his face suddenly years younger. "This is very important, Ilia!" We raised our glasses, toasting to a future neither of us had dared imagine possible.

To my surprise, Gegprifti had been completely unaware of this diplomatic initiative. It seemed President Alia had kept secret meetings with Moskos confidential for five years, from 1985 to 1990, even from his Foreign Minister, Reis Malile. This revelation puzzled me, especially considering Malile's criticism of my views on the émigré community during our contentious meeting in New York in 1986.

I could only conclude that President Alia, ever the strategic thinker, was playing a delicate game. The power struggle between conservative and reformist factions within the Politburo remained fierce. Alia's private desire to establish diplomatic relations with the United States was balanced against his fear of alienating Enver Hoxha's widow, Nexhmije, who still wielded considerable influence among the old guard. By keeping these diplomatic overtures secret, he maintained plausible deniability while testing the waters of international engagement.

Vienna in early April 1990 greeted me with a riot of spring blossoms and a sense of possibility that had long been absent in Tirana. My old friend Ilir Cepani, First Secretary at the Albanian embassy, met me at the airport with a warm embrace. As he drove me through the imperial city's streets, past buildings whose elegance made our Stalinist architecture seem all the more grim by comparison, Cepani chatted about local diplomatic gossip, blissfully unaware of my mission's true purpose.

On April 3, 1990, I entered the elegant Hotel Imperial to meet Professor Moskos for lunch. The restaurant's crystal chandeliers and velvet draperies created an atmosphere of refinement that felt almost surreal after years in Albania's austerity. Prof. Moskos rose as I approached, his face alight with anticipation. After exchanging pleasantries about our families, he sensed from my demeanor that I carried significant news.

"Professor Moskos," I said with a smile I couldn't suppress, "this lunch is on you today."

He laughed, his academic reserve momentarily dissolving. "Don't worry, I have a blank check from the U.S. government."

As the waiter poured a celebratory wine – not the sort one found at casual diplomatic lunches – I raised my glass. "We won," I declared, meeting his eager gaze across the starched tablecloth. "I am here on behalf of President Alia to inform you that Albania is ready to restore diplomatic relations with the United States."

Our glasses clinked, the sound crystalline and perfect, echoing the triumph of years of quiet diplomacy. Empowered to choose the time and place for formal talks, Moskos didn't hesitate. "How about the first week of May at the headquarters of the United Nations in New York?" he proposed.

I readily agreed, feeling the weight of history in that simple nod. After decades of hostility and isolation, after countless missed opportunities and false starts, the door was finally opening.

"I'm going straight to Washington tomorrow," Prof. Moskos declared, his voice charged with purpose. "By this time next week, the wheels will be in motion."

As we left the restaurant and walked through Vienna's cobblestoned streets, a lightness entered my step that had been absent for years. The following day, over coffee at a café near the Hofburg Palace, Moskos shared encouraging news from his American government contacts.

"Ambassador James Woolsey sends his regrets for missing our meeting," he said. "But he wanted me to assure you of Washington's unwavering support for Albania and Kosovo. His exact words were: 'No one will touch them.'" This promise would prove prescient in the years to come, a diplomatic lifeline during the region's darkest hours.

The conversation then took a lighter turn as Moskos mused about possibly becoming the first U.S. ambassador to Albania "if my wife would allow it," he added with a chuckle. Though said in jest, the comment revealed the depth of his commitment to bridge-building between our nations.

As we parted, I sensed the bittersweet nature of our farewell. Our paths were diverging – Prof. Moskos to Washington to formalize what we had begun, I would return to Tirana to navigate the treacherous political currents that still threatened to capsize our fragile vessel of diplomacy. Yet the impact of our work would endure beyond our personal journeys.

Upon my return to the Albanian embassy in Vienna, I discovered that my friend Cepani had weathered an interrogation from Professor Lazeri, President Alia's special advisor. Lazeri, whose academic arrogance was legendary, had been incensed to hear me referred to as "Professor Zhulati" during my visit – a title he considered his exclusive domain. Cepani, demonstrating the diplomatic skill that had earned him his posting, had smoothly explained that I had once been his English teacher, a harmless clarification that nevertheless failed to soothe Lazeri's wounded pride.

Back in Tirana on April 8, 1990, I briefed President Alia on the positive reception of Albania's overture. Four days later, he publicly declared Albania's willingness to establish diplomatic relations with both the United States and the Soviet Union – a dramatic shift that left many in the diplomatic community stunned.

The first formal meeting between Albanian and American delegations in early May 1990 at UN Headquarters proceeded with cautious optimism. Decades of mistrust could not be dispelled in a single session, and Ambassador Pitarka, heading our delegation, returned to Tirana seeking further clarification on specific terms.

Behind the scenes, I wondered how President Alia's advisor, Professor Lazeri – that staunch conservative with his deep-seated suspicion of all things Western – would react as these developments unfolded. Perhaps Alia, demonstrating the strategic acumen that had kept him in power through turbulent times, was deliberately keeping his advisor in the dark until the agreement was too far advanced to derail.

Despite initial momentum, the machinery of the Albanian bureaucracy ground painfully slowly. It wasn't until March 15, 1991, nearly a year after our Vienna meeting, that Foreign Minister Muhamet Kapllani officially signed the memorandum restoring diplomatic relations. This moment represented the culmination of six years of careful work by Professor Moskos and myself, a partnership that had begun in whispers and culminated in formal recognition.

As I watched the signing ceremony, broadcast on Albanian television, a complex emotion washed over me – pride in what we had accomplished, certainly, but also a wistful awareness that Albania opening its doors to America was already changing in ways none of us could fully predict. The future stretched before us, unwritten and uncertain, but at least now we would not face it in isolation.

The shadows of the past still loomed large, and the challenges of rebuilding trust after decades of hostility remained daunting. Yet as spring bloomed across Tirana in 1991, hope began to take root alongside the flowers. The future of Albania was being rewritten, and I had played my small part in that transformation.

During these years of diplomatic maneuvering, my academic aspirations had quietly persisted, a parallel life waiting in the wings. In 1987, I had contacted Thomas Bishop, a linguistics professor at New York University, and his Albanian-American wife, Helen, about visiting Albania once diplomatic ties were restored. The prospect filled them with excitement – Helen would be returning to her ancestral homeland, a journey of both geographic and emotional significance.

Our initial encounter in New York had been facilitated by Leonidas, an Albanian-Greek restaurateur who frequented our events at the UN mission. His own story was emblematic of the diaspora's complexity: fluent in Greek and English but not his native Albanian, he had fled with his father before liberation in 1944, leaving behind his mother and sisters. His annual pilgrimages to Albania continued until his mother's passing, each visit a bittersweet renewal of severed ties.

When the Bishops finally visited in 1990, I arranged for them to be officially invited as "friends of Albania." Over dinners in Tirana, we exchanged stories that spanned continents and ideologies. The Bishops' eagerness to explore Helen's heritage filled me with hope that the barriers between Albania and its far-flung children might finally be dissolving.

During one particularly candid conversation, I confided in Professor Bishop my own academic aspirations. With characteristic generosity, he offered to leverage his connections at the Sorbonne on my behalf. Weeks later, as Albania continued its halting progress toward openness, a letter arrived at my doorstep in Tirana – an invitation to join the prestigious Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Historiques et Physiologiques as an assistant professor and doctoral candidate.

This opportunity represented more than personal advancement; it offered a graceful exit from Albania's increasingly volatile political scene. As 1990 drew to a close, I found myself at the convergence of two paths: one continuing my work in Albania's diplomatic service during this historic transition, the other pursuing academic scholarship in Paris. Both promised to contribute to my homeland's development, though in vastly different ways.

The foundations I had helped lay for diplomatic relations with the United States were beginning to bear fruit. Yet increasingly, I sensed that my future contributions might come through academic rather than diplomatic channels. The Sorbonne invitation represented a bridge between worlds – a chance to bring Western knowledge back to an Albania desperately in need of new ideas and approaches.

As spring approached in 1991, a different Albania was emerging from decades of isolation – an Albania taking its first tentative steps toward democracy, even as I prepared for my own journey of transformation. The diplomatic breakthrough with the United States, culminating in our Vienna meeting and the subsequent formal recognition, had fulfilled my promise to Professor Moskos. Now, as Albania navigated the turbulent waters of democratic transition, a new chapter beckoned from the City of Light.

I stood at my ministry window on my last day before departure, watching Tirana's streets below. The same buildings stood as before, the same mountains ringed the horizon, but everything felt charged with potential. Change had come to Albania at last – halting, uncertain, but undeniable. And change was coming for me as well, carrying me toward Paris and whatever future awaited beyond.

[End of Chapter 6]

 

Be First to Know

Get exclusive launch updates and special offers
First Access
Be notified the moment the book launches
Exclusive Discount
Special launch day pricing for subscribers
Bonus Content
Access to exclusive excerpts and author insights
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.
Help us improve!
How could we make this article more helpful for you?

This content is copyrighted and cannot be copied or saved.